requestId:68499aaba45209.81295407.
Rethinking about Zhang Junqiang and Money Mu’s Controversy: The Contradictory of Civilization and Constitution
Author: Yao Zhongqiu (Qiufeng)
Source: “Qinghua University Journal” (Philosophy and Social Science Edition) 2017 Issue 2
Time: Confucius was in the 2568th year of Dingyou, March 2nd day of Guiyou
Jesus April 16, 2017
Abstract:Teacher Zhang Junxi and Zui Mu are both the main figures of modern new Confucianism. However, they have different learning paths, so they hold opposite views on the nature of Chinese traditional politics and the long-term reincarnation of Confucianism, and disputes occur, either obscure or obvious. Zhang Junyi believed that the path to establishing a political system in modern China was to transplant the local people from all over the world, and the teacher, Mr. Mu, believed that it could be reborn and developed within the Confucian civilization. As a result, the two also had complete differences in their views on the plan for the five rights of Sun Zhongshan Teachers: Money was supported, but Zhang Junxian opposed it. This is inconsistent with the modern Confucian development since the end of the 19th century. Today, it will be a battle between Confucianism in Hong Kong and Confucianism in the mainland.
Keywords:Zhang Junxi;Money Mu; Hong Kong Taiwan New Confucianism; Politics Confucianism; Chinese Traditional Politics; Modern Discipline
【Note】
Teacher Zhang Junxiong
Teacher Zhu Mu
Teacher Zhang Junxiong and Zhu Mu are both representatives of the modern new Confucianism in the relatively neutral modern academic history. However, the two people have different learning paths, and their political views are mostly opposite; especially in their twilight years., openly launched a fierce debate: Zhang Junxian’s last book in his life, “The Controversy of “China Traditional Politics””, is more than 600 pages thick, and it is systematically opposed to the views of Mr. Mu in Chinese history and politics, which can be seen as a big deal in the history of modern new Confucianism.
The money and Zhang Siwei debate can actually be traced back to the Anti-Japanese War. China defeated Japan (Japan) during the Sino-Japanese War, giving birth to the political topic of modern China: the establishment of a modern system. Wuxu Weixin used this as a plea, but this matter was very difficult. We went forward and continued, and China has entered the moment of establishment again and again. Is this really my boss, Ye Qiuguan: KnowledgeBaobao.com experience to destroy her? Is the author thinking about it? Why is the imaginary modern system difficult to produce? After the outbreak of the Anti-Japanese War, the elite group gradually formed a leader in the anti-Japanese war and the founding of the country, so the resistance was always accompanied by the establishment of the war, which was another moment of establishment of China. As the leader of the National Alliance, Zhang Junhe, the head teacher of the National People’s Republic of China, was a lively and main political figure among them. As the political cooperation and chamber of talks, he became the drafter of the Chinese People’s Republic of China’s Republic of China because of the international conference. After completing the draft, he wrote the “Ten Lectures on the Chinese People’s Republic of China’s Republic of China” after passing the draft, which describes the energy and principles of this movement. As for money, it was just a popular academic teaching at that time, and it was not as good as the political figure Zhang Junxian. But he was concerned about the previous Chinese civilization, and of course he would not be outside of this year. Therefore, he published articles in the journals and discussed the design of the law. The international situation of resistance and victory was compiled into “Private Politics” at the end of 1945. At that time, the two people could not directly argue, but the political propositions of the two books published almost at the same time were very different, and they were completely different from their respective arguments a decade or twenty years later. However, the arguments in their late years were made public.
The authors are studying history and discussing the historical civilization thinking of the graduates of the Chinese thought and politics. They recall the academic path of studying Chinese thought and politics so far. They are introduced by the graduates of the public. However, after graduation, he studied in the wasteland. He began to study Western for more than ten years in the mid-1990s of the 20th century, and then transferred to Confucianism. In the process of transferring from Western to Confucianism, Zhang Junhao, the chief teacher, was the main developer. He also enchanted Confucianism and political efforts to fascinate me. He systematically studied his works and published books to explore and discuss his ideological structure and political practices that adhere to the old political theory. Therefore, Zhang Erqi is both my teachers. Both of them have achieved a defense in serious problems. How to adjust? When discussing Teacher Zhang Junqiang, he was troubled by my heart, butIf you lack the ability to learn, you will avoid it. However, this problem lies in my heart, and the most basic difficulties that cannot be solved by Chinese civilization in seeking its rebirth and transformation: Thoughts in the past and present of ChinaTaiwan Nursing Network and political traditions and resources, how did modern China decide, especially in the political field? After more than two thousand years of participation in the Chinese political system, can there be no intent to build a good social management order today? If so, then the ability of Confucianism to shape and maintain the social and political order is not completely lacking in the pursuit of? And Confucianism The key to practicing Buddhism, governing the country and pacifying the country is always the key to practicing. If Confucianism has been politically basic for two thousand years, is there still qualified to participate in and lead the modern era and lead to the great changes in China today?
The highly recurring civilization and political reality on the two sides of the Haima are now, including the recent disputes between representatives of New Confucianism in Hong Kong and representatives of New Confucianism or political Confucianism in Hong Kong, prompting the writers to return to this topic. However, this article does not go into the complicated historical narrative and develop specific corrections as it did when Moi Mu or Zhang Junxian debated, but pays attention to the two people’s approach to understanding China’s traditional political system and the modern institutional and design orientation determined by this. However, the author has already discussed the way Mr. Mu’s understanding of Mr. Mu, so the first article will review and correct the criticism of Mr. Mu, who was criticized by Mr. Mu, and then unintentionally extended the discussion and survey of Mr. Mu’s explanations and investigations to the male supporting role who was trampled by the male protagonist and slapped the stone to remind Mr. Mu of the serious breakdown in his thinking. In the theory, the teacher Sun Zhongshan was introduced to plan to be an intermediary because the political thoughts of both people used this as a sway, either tone or toss, and their respective methods and directions were clearly visible.
1. The difference between the political learning methods between Momo and Zhang Junfeng
At most, since the “National History”, Master Momo and Mr. Momo will be in modern Chinese studies, Including politics, there are many serious criticisms, saying that “modern Chinese scholars are specializing in copying the Oriental as the best-in-class.” Therefore, modern Chinese academics have almost fully transplanted the Oriental. Students use this authority to balance the Chinese political system, and naturally have unconscious and even negative attitudes. Their structure must be fully transplanted. This reflection on Teacher Mu’s life.
As a historian who inherits the tradition of Chinese history and maintains peace of mind for the modern world, Master Mo Mu always believes that modern politics in China is not successfulCan take the path of full-disk transplantation. However, if you want to follow the path of China politically, you will not be able to be independent in your studies first. “National History” discusses all eras, and science is the first to guide. Therefore, the political statements of Mr. Mu often call for reflection on the academic paradigm level: Can the full-display transplanted Oriental Sciences be sufficient to describe and explain China’s thousand-year management practices? Using this academic structure to think about the modern Chinese system, so the complete and unconventional political system is correct? This can be seen i
發佈留言